I spent time trying to understand what that phrase specifically meant. Given the context of the article I think they're using the 'misogynist' definition. It so

I spent time trying to understand what that phrase specifically meant. Given the context of the article I think they're using the 'misogynist' definition. It sounds like you've gone with the 'straight white entitled male' definition. The ambiguity, which is probably intentional, makes the phrase even more problematic.