2 ms·
> If you go the dynamic linking route no source distribution is required. For your code. The LGPL code still requires source distribution. (Plus, the BSD claus
by wizzwizz4 5y ago
> If you go the dynamic linking route no source distribution is required.
For your code. The LGPL code still requires source distribution. (Plus, the BSD clause requires attribution.)
- eurasiantiger 5y agoCertainly the authors of said LGPL code are distributing that source. Would it make sense to distribute the source of every .dll included in a project?
- wizzwizz4 5y ago… Yes. That's your obligation under the LGPL. Pretty much your only obligation, actually – other than including the “this is this, by these people, licensed this way” boilerplate text.
- manquer 5y agoAlternatively you could include the offer to distribute
- wizzwizz4 5y agoOnly with (L)GPLv2, I believe.