> 1. Zero trust is highly optimal for business. When it is systemically impossible to cheat your vendor/customer, nobody even tries. Happy path only. I don't u

> 1. Zero trust is highly optimal for business. When it is systemically impossible to cheat your vendor/customer, nobody even tries. Happy path only. I don't understand what point you tried to make, and frankly it sounds incoherent. Moreover, the weasel word "highly optimal" means nothing. You failed to present any value proposition, specially when discussing a solved problem. This is perhaps the main problem plaguing web3 proponents: they always fail to present any value proposition at all, and instead resort to all sorts of handwaving to try to distract away from that void > 2. Good luck suing someone in a foreign jurisdiction with incompatible legal systems. This statement fails to take into consideration the very notion of a jurisdiction, and somehow presumes that a shop in a country which chose to do trans-national business shouldn't have to deal with the legal implications of operating in another country. > 3. You miss the great innovation of SN: Preventing Double Spends. That is not innovation in commerce: it was already a solved problem before the inception of blockchain-based technologies.