Precisely. People act like this DMCA anti-subversion nonsense is a necessary consequence of copyright as we know it, and that's fundamentally not true. Anti-sub

Precisely. People act like this DMCA anti-subversion nonsense is a necessary consequence of copyright as we know it, and that's fundamentally not true. Anti-subversion laws are a recent invention, were a horrible overreaction to some business models no longer being viable, and created the legal situation where merely using a device or a piece of software puts you, the end user, in a trap, where your autonomy is secondary to whatever business model the company that made it envisioned, enforced by the threat of ruin at the hands of the state. Now, I don't view IP in general as legitimate, but to say this nonsense the DMCA foisted on our legal system is a straightforward application of copyright as we knew it before is just ignorance, plain and simple