3 ms·
It's not clear to me that these changes make an app like this impossible. There would be a lot of implementation churn, and maybe some user visible differences,
by modeless 5y ago
It's not clear to me that these changes make an app like this impossible. There would be a lot of implementation churn, and maybe some user visible differences, but I think the main issue here is they don't want to spend the time to rewrite the app, and maybe there's some fear of future changes breaking it again. Which is totally fair, churn sucks. But on the other hand there are real, serious security issues motivating these changes that should not be minimized.
- yarcob 5y agoGoogle, Apple and Microsoft have been making a lot of security-related changes in the OSes in the last few years. The result is that a lot of apps need updating or just no longer work. It's not an issue for apps that are actively developed -- but it's devastating for side projects or open source apps that rely on volunteers. Some changes (like new code signing requirements) might be possible to implement in a few days, but if you need to make bigger changes you are quickly looking at weeks of development time -- which is kinda hard sell for people who develop software in their free time.
- Noumenon72 5y agoIt's really killing my enthusiasm for mobile phones that all my old apps are stopping working. My sleep alarm and Tasker screen blocker fell prey to permissions/battery saving issues, and Swype and a few others shut down.
- xeromal 5y agoThat's the impression I got from their post. It was a passion project (meaning goodwill, costs more than it makes) that Google has forced them to rewrite and it's not going to happen because passion projects can only cost so much of the budget.