4 ms·
The first time I used Mathematica (20 years ago) it blew my mind. To be fair it was the first time I used a CAS and so the very idea of a computer crushing me a
by linspace 5y ago
The first time I used Mathematica (20 years ago) it blew my mind. To be fair it was the first time I used a CAS and so the very idea of a computer crushing me at several calculus tasks was incredible.
From the open source alternatives the better supported I think is (wx)Maxima, which for the simple tasks I usually require (i.e some Taylor series, check cumbersome trigometric equations, ...) it's more than enough although it's true it lacks by a long margin the polish of Mathematica. Recently I'm considering buying an educational version of Mathematica just for the convenience. It sucks it's a closed source program but it's rare, although not impossible, for open source alternatives to have the same good documentation and ease of use. I guess that the attention to these details is not something people usually do unless being paid.
Now, tangentially related, this is extremely cool (and previously posted in HN I think): https://ai.facebook.com/blog/using-neural-networks-to-solve-advanced-mathematics-equations/ https://ai.facebook.com/blog/using-neural-networks-to-solve-...
- jjgreen 5y agoI've never liked Mathematica, it gets notation all wrong, Sin[x] where it should be sin(x), Maple got this right.
- DerekL 5y agoThat's probably because they wanted to use juxtaposition for multiplication. Otherwise, “f(x)” could mean either f applied to x or f times x in parentheses.
- billfruit 5y agoWhat about Axiom, it seems to have been worked on for many decades.