3 ms·
This is not complicated. Giving people money not to work results in more money and less production. But there's a bunch of people with money, so demand is hig
by SamReidHughes 5y ago
This is not complicated.
Giving people money not to work results in more money and less production. But there's a bunch of people with money, so demand is higher than it'd otherwise be.
- nosianu 5y agoSo according to this food prices increase because people buy (and eat) more food. With many Americans already overweight... In any case, do you have any proof that more food is bought? I'm having a hard time believing this, unless people were lacking food previously. If they didn't spend that money on food, how did those prices increase? Which parts of the stuff that goes into food increased? Links to actual data is severely missing from all the assertions made here. A moderate one-time stimulus check is responsible, really? Because all that other money that was created was not given to many people and I would like to see some data if you want to claim it ended up with them anyway by now. General wide-spread wage increases of according size, for example.
- SamReidHughes 5y agoIt's the whole economy. Labor costs are up. This drives labor costs in food production/transport/retail up (or else workers will switch jobs). Hence food prices. And demand remaining high is what keeps labor costs up. So, food prices can go up and down even if food-specific demand is inelastic (that is, even if people eat the same amount and quality of food regardless of price). FWIW I've found my food demand not to be 100% inelastic -- I have changed where I get fast food as a result of some price increases, and I've found that in times when I'm not making a steady income, I find it easier to maintain or lose weight.
- RobertoG 5y agoThis is a supply problem. We have supply chains disorganized because COVID, bad crops and, specially, crazy energy prices (that affect everything). How could prices not go up?
- Ekaros 5y agoNot to forget that good amount of things like produce was destroyed as supply chain wasn't handling it anymore. It should be clear that just that alone would result in increase of prices as the food need to be replaced with something else. As supply-demand is at least somewhat balanced. Remove from supply side do to supply chain not accepting it, the demand overall is constant, prices go up.