3 ms·

That's entirely false. The AZ/British vaccine is being provided at cost https://www.theguardian.com/business/2021/mar/28/astrazeneca-vaccine-deserves-celebrat

That's entirely false. The AZ/British vaccine is being provided at cost https://www.theguardian.com/business/2021/mar/28/astrazeneca-vaccine-deserves-celebration-not-scorn https://www.theguardian.com/business/2021/mar/28/astrazeneca... > AstraZeneca is one of the shining stars of the pandemic. Not only did it produce a vaccine where other big players failed, the UK-Swedish company has pledged to sell it at cost until it is able to declare the pandemic over. If countries still can't afford it they are being given away https://www.gov.uk/government/news/uk-begins-donating-millions-of-covid-19-vaccines-overseas https://www.gov.uk/government/news/uk-begins-donating-millio... > the UK has pledged to donate 100 million vaccines overseas by June 2022, 80 million of which will go to COVAX

ryan_lane 5y ago
That's one vaccine and one country, and you're not arguing against my point, but shifting the discussion back to donations. The number of vaccines being donated are not even close to sufficient to protect the countries without the means to produce the vaccines. Many countries could produce these vaccines, but are not legally allowed to because we're protecting the patents, so that companies can make profit on them. Without patent protection, they wouldn't be the only companies manufacturing them. It's also strange to say it's entirely false, while giving one example in which the vaccines are being given at cost. Many of the vaccines are not. In some cases the companies are not profiting, in other cases they are.