3 ms·
This seems like a strategy designed to kill airframes via sheer number of pressurization cycles?
by oh_sigh 5y ago
This seems like a strategy designed to kill airframes via sheer number of pressurization cycles?
- sofixa 5y agoNope, it's how short-haul single-aisle aircraft are operated. They make money only when operating a flight, and the more you can squeeze in a day, the more money it will make. That's why their life in years is usually significantly lower than medium/long-haul multi-aisle aircraft, which often get converted to freighters after retirement, since the main thing that matters is number of pressurisation cycles ( and fuel efficiency, but it's whole different story).
- ars 5y ago> This seems like a strategy designed to kill airframes via sheer number of pressurization cycles? That's what planes are for - to use them. They are not museum pieces to be preserved.
- deleted 5y ago[deleted]
- hodgesrm 5y agoIt certainly wears them out. Hawiian Air has the highest number of pressurization cycles of any US commercial airline (at least as far as I can tell--ontime data shows up to 18). So far they seem to have managed it without issues. Another airline in the region, Aloha Air, did suffer an inflight fatality in 1988 when the fuselage ruptured. The cause was apparently poor maintenance. [0] [0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aloha_Airlines_Flight_243 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aloha_Airlines_Flight_243