3 ms·
In the same vein that we would not brook "white people's toys" or "Handicapped people's toys". I.e., even a shopkeeper may not stop people from buying cross sec
by lr4444lr 5y ago
In the same vein that we would not brook "white people's toys" or "Handicapped people's toys". I.e., even a shopkeeper may not stop people from buying cross section in those examples, but we recognize that it conveys an intimidating hostility and don't allow it.
- gruez 5y agoBut are "men's" section in clothing stores fine, even though many pieces of garment can plausibly be worn by both genders?
- lr4444lr 5y agoThat's a good point. The clothing itself is alreay labeled that way though, and its literally part of the sizing. I guess I'd say the manufacturers are the better target for legislative changes on that. The shopkeeper is simply conveying the information he's given in the vast majority of the products.
- ceejayoz 5y agoOld Navy and Target both have gender-neutral sections now.