I know we're not supposed to say "did you read the article" around here but there was a fair amount of nuance in it and you don't sound like you disagree with i

I know we're not supposed to say "did you read the article" around here but there was a fair amount of nuance in it and you don't sound like you disagree with it in any huge sense. > Half the time when I see "JS is so broken!" posts they're by Ruby devs. I can't help wonder why they're all so keen to move away from Ruby. That's an interesting assumption. I would have started from the position that javascript is a mainly a front-end solution so one wouldn't "move away from Ruby" to use it because you would still use Ruby on the back end.