"...that conventional wisdom is wrong..." ... "...For the very first time in its history...". So people are wrong to assume that windows products are vulnerabl

"...that conventional wisdom is wrong..." ... "...For the very first time in its history...". So people are wrong to assume that windows products are vulnerable just because for the first in years it happend not to be ? This article is pointless imo, doesn't explain why is it any safer, only assumes it because some hacker HIRED by microsoft said so.