5 ms·
This is marketing BS. S3 buckets aren't vulnerable to ransomware but maybe your configurations are. Not to mention the article sets up S3 being vulnerable as
by kaydub 5y ago
This is marketing BS.
S3 buckets aren't vulnerable to ransomware but maybe your configurations are.
Not to mention the article sets up S3 being vulnerable as if your credentials that access those S3 buckets were compromised.
- stevekemp 5y agoYes, very much a scaremonger piece that will attract the attention of managers. "Did you know your online bank-account is at risk, if your email username/password is compromised?"
- liorermetic 5y agoThanks for the feedback (I've participated in this work) The point of the original piece was to discuss how the complexity of AWS IAM management (which is a very real problem in more ways than one) could lead to S3 ransomware exposure People reading it could benefit from learning how that's true and what are some ways to deal with it
- geoduck14 5y ago>This is marketing BS I disagree. >S3 buckets aren't vulnerable to ransomware but maybe your configurations are. This is not just "correct" - it is CRITICAL to understand. The configurations are so complex, it is THE way people will get at your data.
- aldarisbm 5y agos3 defaults to private, yes it's critical to understand, but that can be said for every piece of data storage in the world.