>I think, without evidence, that he was working with a US adversary and his entire public image will collapse under scrutiny in court. Should I follow that or w

>I think, without evidence, that he was working with a US adversary and his entire public image will collapse under scrutiny in court. Should I follow that or wait for more information? None of the charges have anything to do with him working with a US adversary, it's silly to think revelations about that will come out in a trial for a completely unrelated incident. Remember, the hackers that supposedly stole the DNC documents have already been indicted, and the US Justice System was so convinced that Wikileaks and Assange were not involved in criminal activity that they called them something like "organization A." If he was knowingly working with them, they would have charged him in those indictments. Even from a PR standpoint, why would the US spend years getting negative press about their treatment of Assange if they had a slam dunk like that.