4 ms·
using air purifiers like that for corona is mostly theater anyway, since air purifiers don't filter the air evenly (despite the misnomer metric "air changes per
by clairity 5y ago
using air purifiers like that for corona is mostly theater anyway, since air purifiers don't filter the air evenly (despite the misnomer metric "air changes per hour") in a room. mostly, it filters really well near the purifiers and poorly everywhere else. this of course depends on the strength of the fan, but for most consumer air purifiers, it's likely a few feet radius at best. that's not to say that even that isn't worth having in an average bedroom, but in a classroom, it's likely not doing much at all.
also, you're already distancing (which is doing nearly all the work there) and wearing masks (which is mostly theater in a distanced classroom as well). the virus isn't free-floating live in the classroom. most virus falls to the ground directly. of what's aloft, it becomes inactivated pretty quickly for all sorts of reasons (dessication, ph, temperature, radiation, etc.) and most likely won't land anywhere near a viable infection spot. so almost no active virus is filtered out before it has a chance to reach a moist, viable passageway in another person.
even huge central commercial systems likely wouldn't filter out coronavirus before they die off or land somewhere harmlessly. it's another potential intervention that sounds plausible on the surface, but is mostly useless against covid.
- auslegung 5y agoSo much of what you’ve said is wrong. Not saying you’re a terrible human being, but what we know about these things is still, unfortunately, not settled. Can you give citations for 1. Air purifiers don’t filter the air evenly (commercial ones since that’s the context). 2. Social distancing indoors is doing most of the work (ie is almost all that’s needed to stop the spread). 3. The virus isn’t free-floating live in the classroom
- clairity 5y agono, but you’re welcome to present your own perspective and rationale for discussion. research is ongoing, but we certainly have enough time and information to form and debate hypotheses by now. for instance, this study did not link air filtration to a reduction in transmission, only that a hepa+uv filter can reduce sars-cov-2 from known aerosolized air, basically an expected result in a controlled study (not “real-world”, as claimed).