3 ms·
It looks like you have responded from wrong account .
by daliusd 5y ago
It looks like you have responded from wrong account .
- 0des 5y agoI'll admit, I had this same suspicion about this poster and one other in this thread.
- exBarrelSpoiler 5y agoAre you Global Security or something? What makes you so invested in defending the wealthiest company on earth?
- 0des 5y agoWhat amount of wealth makes a company inherently guilty of all accusations? As Ive expressed in other posts, I don't hold Apple in high regard as a company at all, I merely find her claims to give me an impression that counters what she is asserting.
- exBarrelSpoiler 5y agoMy point is that regardless of the validity of her claims, this is a good opportunity for society to draw closer inspection towards Apple. It’s similar to how Susan Fowler’s revelations finally provided the opportunity for society to turn its attention towards Uber. No one is saying Apple is inherently guilty, but it has assumed a societal perception of inherent innocence, skating by with lack of inspection while other tech giants have not. And all that wealth correlates to power and influence, does it not? And generally it should behoove us to inspect the powerful and influential. For too long any criticism of Apple has been easily shut down, even though they’re not even the plucky underdog on the verge of bankruptcy they once were!
- exBarrelSpoiler 5y agoNo, that was intentional. I don’t know the previous account, I am simply sick of people trying to shut down discussion of Apple criticism.
- _8j50 5y agoAre you people seriously brigading? Not invested in the topic at all but somehow people are trying ad-hominem against me to protect apple. You know, this only reinforces my suspicion that apple is beyond toxic, likely crossed over the criminal boundary! @dang , if you see this, please look into these people's behavior on this post.