4 ms·

Again, which version of semver are you talking about? And yes, of course they would have, but at least they wouldn't be able to lie about what theyre doing. T

by lugged 5y ago

Again, which version of semver are you talking about? And yes, of course they would have, but at least they wouldn't be able to lie about what theyre doing. There is a better alternative, maintain backwards compatibility. And if you break it, acknowledge what you're doing, forking your lib and leaving everyone who relied on you holding the bag. Linux has maintained backwards compat for decades, there really isn't much excuse.

paulryanrogers 5y ago
> Linux has maintained backwards compat for decades, there really isn't much excuse. In what way? IIRC there is no stable ABI in Linux. Regardless maintaining backward compatibility forever is non-trivial. Besides Java I can't think of another major platform still actively supporting their v1.0 work.
- int_19h 5y ago
  Syscalls are the stable ABI in Linux.