2 ms·
I dislike this ruling, because: 1. It affirms the legal right of people or abstract entities to prevent you from copying information - that is, to have the sta
by einpoklum 5y ago
I dislike this ruling, because:
1. It affirms the legal right of people or abstract entities to prevent you from copying information - that is, to have the state punish you for copying information from one page to another or from one file to another. This is immoral, anti-social.
2. It affirms the legal right to prevent you from creating modified, adapted, combined or partial versions of a piece of software or text, when you have a copy of the entire original.
3. It only allows decompilation by someone who has paid for the right to hold a copy of a program, and then only for the purpose of getting the program to work properly.
Now, you could say "but that's EU law" - and while that's true, but it doesn't make it any better. People should face no negative consequences for making copies of things, whether exact or modified.
- dane-pgp 5y agoSo you admit that the problem is the law, but you dislike the fact that the judges correctly interpreted it. If you want judges to be able to rewrite laws to your liking, you should be aware that other people with worse views on copyright might also want judges doing that.
- seoaeu 5y agoYou were hoping that the court would find the very concept of copyright to be invalid?