4 ms·

Bitwarden is great. You can even self-host the server if you want to.

• sofixa 5y ago
  There's even a FOSS alternative for the server, so there's even flexibility there.
  • ancarda 5y ago
    Isn't Bitwarden Server AGPL? If not, you can link me to the alternative?
    • newscracker 5y ago
      One popular server implementation is Vaultwarden (originally called bitwarden_rs), implemented in Rust. [1] The Vaultwarden wiki [2] has more details. [1]: https://github.com/dani-garcia/vaultwarden https://github.com/dani-garcia/vaultwarden [2]: https://github.com/dani-garcia/vaultwarden/wiki https://github.com/dani-garcia/vaultwarden/wiki
    • seabrookmx 5y ago
      The popular alternative is bitwarden-rs, and it's usually chosen because it has a much smaller footprint and is well suited to self-hosting where you only have a handful of users. The official backend is multi-container and uses a full SQL server install.
      • fancy_pantser 5y ago
        Minor nit: they've had to change the name to "vaultwarden". https://github.com/dani-garcia/vaultwarden#readme https://github.com/dani-garcia/vaultwarden#readme > Note: This project was known as Bitwarden_RS and has been renamed to separate itself from the official Bitwarden server in the hopes of avoiding confusion and trademark/branding issues. Please see #1642 for more explanation.