"its own spent fuel is only dangerous for on the order of a thousand years (600-1200), instead of the 30,000 from current US designs", hmmm, I get it, by reduci

"its own spent fuel is only dangerous for on the order of a thousand years (600-1200), instead of the 30,000 from current US designs", hmmm, I get it, by reducing the dangerous period of nuclear waste from 30000 year to 600~1200 years resolves the problem per the author... Hopefully there was a typo, it was really meant to be 600 days instead of 600 years, or vent it was really meant 600 months, I just cannot see how that could be deemed as a solution.