3 ms·
Source for the first point is here around 37-38 mins in https://youtu.be/NKD1-xH9_Fk https://youtu.be/NKD1-xH9_Fk I just want to make it clear that the source
by mhoad 5y ago
Source for the first point is here around 37-38 mins in https://youtu.be/NKD1-xH9_Fk https://youtu.be/NKD1-xH9_Fk
I just want to make it clear that the source itself isn’t a YouTube video here but that this video happens to have an incredibly well respected person from the industry addressing that particular topic that might help provide context.
For the second point it went a bit beyond that. There are a lot of examples but here’s a couple https://www.wired.co.uk/article/wikileaks-private-medical-data-email-leaks https://www.wired.co.uk/article/wikileaks-private-medical-da...
- Semaphor 5y agoIf the video is not the actual source, why not link the actual source? I certainly have a bigger hate of videos than normal, as any kind of research into them requires far more work than proper text, so I’d be happy to get anything that can be more easily verified. For the second point, according to the article it was pretty minor stuff where what The Guardian did was far worse.