> Like a standard trait library and a standard implementation library for those traits. This sounds like a very good idea. (The thinness of the std future API

> Like a standard trait library and a standard implementation library for those traits. This sounds like a very good idea. (The thinness of the std future API paved the way for multiple async runtimes. And sowed confusion! evil laugh But seriously, having a high throughput optimized runtime like Tokio and a size optimized like smol is a good thing.) But a very much non trivial amount of work. Has this been discussed on internals?