3 ms·
That's more the benefits of cloud rather than nosql though. 200 writes/second is not even scale, a single instance would handle that fine, with beefy hardware
by zepolen 5y ago
That's more the benefits of cloud rather than nosql though.
200 writes/second is not even scale, a single instance would handle that fine, with beefy hardware you could do 100x that.
You could even run it in cloud, for about $50/month, and as a bonus use the same instance to perform the analytics which will be real time.
Not to mention enjoying much better data integrity.
- HWR_14 5y agoWhich cloud lets you rent a beefy SQL server for $50/mo? This is actually really useful info to me, as we're looking at needing to migrate to a new provider soon.
- zepolen 5y agoI mean you're going to have to be more specific than that, some clouds have high cpu but expensive disk, others the reverse. $50/mo will not get you both, but it will easily get you 200tx/s.
- HWR_14 5y agoI was thinking low disk costs. There doesn't seem to be much need for a CPU other than input validation. Although I guess currently our analysis is mostly done offline with a downloaded partial data set. It would be nice to do it in the cloud.