3 ms·
I think that's the system working as intended. Coinbase decided to focus on consensus rather than pure raw technical competence (which is also what companies do
by Zababa 5y ago
I think that's the system working as intended. Coinbase decided to focus on consensus rather than pure raw technical competence (which is also what companies do when they try to meet diversity quota). You don't agree with their consensus, so you explain them so they have data and a chance to reconsider, and you can go in a company that aligns more with your values. While I don't doubt at all your technical competence, I doubt your are irreplacable (I'm not irreplacable too, and most people are not of course, this is not "against" you), so that's just the market doing its thing.
I have a biais for people that are honest about their values, so I'm glad about their move, but I understand not everyone shares my biais.
- xyzzyz 5y agoCoinbase decided to focus on consensus rather than pure raw technical competence (which is also what companies do when they try to meet diversity quota). Companies trying to meet the diversity quota very much do not focus on pure raw technical competence. In fact, to suggest so, borders on gaslighting.
- Zababa 5y agoSorry, the way I put it wasn't clear, but that was my point. Only putting "also" to indicate that is an error on my part, it's easy to interpret my statement in the exact opposite way. What I meant to say was: "Coinbase decided to focus on consensus rather than pure raw technical competence. Companies that try to meet diversity quotas are also focusing on consensus rather than pure raw technical competence. These companies and Coinbase are similar in that way."