4 ms·
Altought I liked Borland IDE's, did't liked their UIs neither. For me the best text UI's ever created were Symantec's, which used some custom icons (ie arrows,
by ffhhj 5y ago
Altought I liked Borland IDE's, did't liked their UIs neither. For me the best text UI's ever created were Symantec's, which used some custom icons (ie arrows, buttons), and nicer tech colors:
https://diarywind.com/blog/img/g13/fcf379da7cb57db6feb94d563346a938.png https://diarywind.com/blog/img/g13/fcf379da7cb57db6feb94d563...
https://winworldpc.com/res/img/screenshots/10-for-dos-54195bb87006eb11f7dcae6ce4a21484-Norton%20Desktop%20for%20Dos%20-%20desk.png https://winworldpc.com/res/img/screenshots/10-for-dos-54195b...
- zozbot234 5y agoThe DOSSHELL included in MS-DOS itself also used some custom graphics, but that was totally optional. The interface was still based around the usual hardware text mode.
- andrewshadura 5y agoIn fact, DOS Shell used a real graphics mode as well.