Thanks... that is what I thought. Honestly, like I mentioned, I don't see that as a particularly useful advantage. The thing is, there is no single line that m

Thanks... that is what I thought. Honestly, like I mentioned, I don't see that as a particularly useful advantage. The thing is, there is no single line that makes a library suitable for my project, whether it's for a constrained environment or not. I carefully consider many aspects of a library, all from the perspective of what, specifically, my project needs. no_std might be one thing to look for, but I don't know that it's really answering that many of my questions. Also, in my embedded dabbling, there seem to be such an incredibly rich set of libraries available for constrained environments it is astounding. So the lack of no_std doesn't seem to be holding non-Rust back. > In C you would have to either write everything yourself, read through all of your dependencies, or just cross your fingers. I really don't think no_std changes that at all.