3 ms·
It's not ironic. It's literally the point of why he's calling it "mission-focused" and not "apolitical." If the almost all members of the NAACP happened to be p
by Aunche 5y ago
It's not ironic. It's literally the point of why he's calling it "mission-focused" and not "apolitical." If the almost all members of the NAACP happened to be pro-crypto, do you it's reasonable for it's members to pressure its leadership to spread the adoption of crypto?
- greenie_beans 5y agoyou missed my point. i'm arguing that coinbase is in the business of pushing their own politics, via cryptocurrency, which is very much a political thing at this point. yet, their workers can't discuss other politics. it's very ironic and hypocritical. and yes, i think the members of NAACP would be pushing crypto if that's what they felt was a priority for their cause. i don't understand your logic? edit: i believe that being apolitical is just as a political stance as being political.
- tesselator 5y agoSounds like joining a charity that focuses on topic X and trying to get them to focus about topic Y. Join a charity that focuses on topic Y instead.
- greenie_beans 5y agotwo things: 1. the NAACP is political activist organization, not a charity. 2. i'm not sure this is sound logic. if the NAACP sees something as advancing black people, then why can't they advocate for that?