4 ms·
I don't understand why this content is allowed. Without a subscription it's literally just an ad for a subscription. And I'm not going to buy a subscription for
by pluc 5y ago
I don't understand why this content is allowed. Without a subscription it's literally just an ad for a subscription. And I'm not going to buy a subscription for the three articles I read every month.
- lelandfe 5y agoOnce they start blocking archive.is I'll probably care more
- dundarious 5y agoIt's a major national US newspaper -- many, many people have subscriptions.
- rob74 5y agoWell, I live in Germany, and I'm not going to subscribe to a major national US newspaper just for the few articles that get linked here. If they had a micropayment alternative for single articles I would consider it however...
- dundarious 5y agoWhich is all fair enough. I'm opposing pluc's point that this type of post should perhaps be disallowed: > I don't understand why this content is allowed. It's certainly an appropriate post for a US-centric forum.
- detaro 5y ago> I don't understand why this content is allowed. Because a workaround is available. > And I'm not going to buy a subscription for the three articles I read every month. Then click the link in the comment you replied to and read it.