3 ms·
Yes, that is the problem, and yes, USPS banking would solve it. I haven't disagreed with either of those things. But here, again, you're talking about the chec
by awillen 5y ago
Yes, that is the problem, and yes, USPS banking would solve it. I haven't disagreed with either of those things.
But here, again, you're talking about the check cashing industry, and to be blunt you have no idea what you're talking about.
"so would legislation setting a max check cashing fee of $3.00 or something similar" - read this page carefully: https://www.walmart.com/cp/check-cashing/632047 https://www.walmart.com/cp/check-cashing/632047. Walmart's max fee for checks up to $1000 is $4. The problem is that a lot of people are cashing small checks - even if it only costs $2, somebody cashing a $50 check is still paying 4%. But what are check cashing places supposed to do? Charge pennies to cash small checks? They have fixed costs that aren't going to be covered by amounts that small.
So yes, it is a problem that people can't cash checks for free. But that's not a problem with the check cashing industry, it's a problem with the financial system as a whole. You should read the book I recommended before you keep criticizing - you're just being a keyboard warrior who's never set foot inside a check cashing business criticizing something you don't understand.
Here's an actual solution for you - the government requires all banks to cash all checks under a certain size, regardless of whether someone has an account at that bank. The government is then responsible for reimbursing any money lost to fraudulent checks (and prosecuting those who pass them).
- coredog64 5y agoThat last bit is a possibly huge unintended consequence. Crimes that would typically be a misdemeanor suddenly turn into federal charges when the USPS is involved. Would we see an increase in federal prosecutions for passing bad checks if postal banking is widespread?
- awillen 5y agoI'm not sure what the significance of the fact that they would be federal prosecutions is. You say misdemeanors would turn into federal charges, but that's not how it works - they'd still be misdemeanors, just charged by the federal government instead of the government of an individual state.