4 ms·
On the surface this might seem like it would increase risky behavior by infected individuals, but there's a rational reason for this law. It was advocated by ep
by mullingitover 5y ago
On the surface this might seem like it would increase risky behavior by infected individuals, but there's a rational reason for this law. It was advocated by epidemiologists for good reason: when someone could be criminally liable for said exposure, they'll absolutely stonewall public health officials who are trying to contact trace exposures. Adding criminal liability to the mix simply doesn't result in the desired outcome of stopping the spread of the disease.
- snapetom 5y agoMakes sense, but you're still condemning the victim to a lifetime of drugs and compromised immune system with little consequence.
- mullingitover 5y agoI don't think any existing laws preclude civil suits for remediation of those damages. This is just removing the criminal charges.