> Are you saying [extreme borderline-strawman statement that is obviously not what I said at all] I'm saying it's possible that a few extremely powerful corpor

> Are you saying [extreme borderline-strawman statement that is obviously not what I said at all] I'm saying it's possible that a few extremely powerful corporations chose to develop a vaccine that is less useful than it could have been, and are profiting off the difference. I'm also saying that the big ones might have enough influence to get away with a less-effective vaccine than some smaller player who can get swallowed up, if needed. I'm also aware that the scientific consensus you seem to think exists about the vaccine, doesn't. I'm also aware that you don't need to get all those experts on board - just like 20 years ago when it was the tinfoil hat conspiracy theorists who thought the government was spying on them, all you have to do is make the dissidents look ridiculous. Lizard people, eh?