5 ms·

so you support rounding up the fatties as they are the #1 risk right? since we don't have a 100% vaccine we should do everything we can. next step, everyone ca

so you support rounding up the fatties as they are the #1 risk right? since we don't have a 100% vaccine we should do everything we can. next step, everyone can have a 1x1 jail cell to be 100% safe.

SideburnsOfDoom 5y ago
It's a gish gallop through the greatest hits of the antivaxers. You can still get it so what's the point of vaccination! Fat people! Maybe there are side effects! Vaers! Liberty! Not a proper vaccine! Whenever one is countered, just swap to the next one, and cycle back to the first when you run out. We've seen all of these before. It's very tiresome and a bit sad.
- hunterb123 5y ago
  One usually cycles through retorts when one is confronted with the same propaganda! > Oh those pesky anti-vaxxers taking up ICU beds, that's how they harm vaccinated! Ok so we should make sure all the risks of covid are minimized, lets encourage the reducing of the leading morbidity of covid and other diseases by forcing people to eat healthy. It seems to me people like you are more accepting to force people to inject something into them than you are to force people to exercise or eat right. Both are appalling, one you see is appalling, the other you do not. If the vaccine works for you, great. Unvaccinated people are not a risk, the ICU is not going to crumble and there are much more dangerous things in life to give up your freedoms for. Just incase your precious ICU fills up, first you could kick out the "anti-vaxxers", then the fatties, then anyone with a criminal background, next we can have a government panel decide who does or doesn't get care!
  - SideburnsOfDoom 5y ago
    "unvaccinated people are not a risk" is factually wrong. The rest is basically gibberish. Good luck being unvaccinated with the COVID.
    - deleted 5y ago
      [deleted]
  - dzhiurgis 5y ago
    Let’s meet in the middle and fortify junk food with vaccines
    - hunterb123 5y ago
      If we're at the point of society of banning things and forcing injections I don't see why we can't just ban sugar. The argument isn't unvaccinated people are spreading covid directly to vaccinated people, it's now that unvaccinated people are taking up ICU space and resources. Under that logic we should start cracking down on other things that stress the healthcare system. We should start looking at the other leading causes of hospitalizations. That's heart disease, cardiovascular disease, and diabetes. Got any idea what those have in common? Maybe if you're a PoS person, and your social score is low enough, you don't get care. Likewise, maybe if you caused that car collision, you don't get care? All because the ICU might hit capacity. Talk about fear mongering.
      - dzhiurgis 5y ago
        > I don't see why we can't just ban sugar. call 1-800-950-NAMI they will explain
      - dragonwriter 5y ago
        > If we're at the point of society of banning things We’ve been at that point for, literally, all of recorded history. You are a little late to the realization. > I don't see why we can't just ban sugar. We can. The question is whether we should; banning popular, habituating substances has a pretty bad track record of doing more to exacerbate than solve the problems associated with consumption, as well as being a source for all kinds of additional problems. “Banning” isn't the same thing as “magically eliminating”.
        hunterb123 5y ago
        > We can. The question is whether we should; Yeah that's my point. The backlash of banning things is warranted for many reasons. But why care when we've already moved on to forced injections through career intimidation.

so you support rounding up the fatties as they are the #1 risk right? since we don't have a 100% vaccine we should do everything we can. next step, everyone can have a 1x1 jail cell to be 100% safe.

SideburnsOfDoom 5y ago

It's a gish gallop through the greatest hits of the antivaxers. You can still get it so what's the point of vaccination! Fat people! Maybe there are side effects! Vaers! Liberty! Not a proper vaccine! Whenever one is countered, just swap to the next one, and cycle back to the first when you run out. We've seen all of these before. It's very tiresome and a bit sad.

hunterb123 5y ago
One usually cycles through retorts when one is confronted with the same propaganda! > Oh those pesky anti-vaxxers taking up ICU beds, that's how they harm vaccinated! Ok so we should make sure all the risks of covid are minimized, lets encourage the reducing of the leading morbidity of covid and other diseases by forcing people to eat healthy. It seems to me people like you are more accepting to force people to inject something into them than you are to force people to exercise or eat right. Both are appalling, one you see is appalling, the other you do not. If the vaccine works for you, great. Unvaccinated people are not a risk, the ICU is not going to crumble and there are much more dangerous things in life to give up your freedoms for. Just incase your precious ICU fills up, first you could kick out the "anti-vaxxers", then the fatties, then anyone with a criminal background, next we can have a government panel decide who does or doesn't get care!
- SideburnsOfDoom 5y ago
  "unvaccinated people are not a risk" is factually wrong. The rest is basically gibberish. Good luck being unvaccinated with the COVID.
  - deleted 5y ago
    [deleted]
- dzhiurgis 5y ago
  Let’s meet in the middle and fortify junk food with vaccines
  - hunterb123 5y ago
    If we're at the point of society of banning things and forcing injections I don't see why we can't just ban sugar. The argument isn't unvaccinated people are spreading covid directly to vaccinated people, it's now that unvaccinated people are taking up ICU space and resources. Under that logic we should start cracking down on other things that stress the healthcare system. We should start looking at the other leading causes of hospitalizations. That's heart disease, cardiovascular disease, and diabetes. Got any idea what those have in common? Maybe if you're a PoS person, and your social score is low enough, you don't get care. Likewise, maybe if you caused that car collision, you don't get care? All because the ICU might hit capacity. Talk about fear mongering.
    - dzhiurgis 5y ago
      > I don't see why we can't just ban sugar. call 1-800-950-NAMI they will explain
    - dragonwriter 5y ago
      > If we're at the point of society of banning things We’ve been at that point for, literally, all of recorded history. You are a little late to the realization. > I don't see why we can't just ban sugar. We can. The question is whether we should; banning popular, habituating substances has a pretty bad track record of doing more to exacerbate than solve the problems associated with consumption, as well as being a source for all kinds of additional problems. “Banning” isn't the same thing as “magically eliminating”.
      - hunterb123 5y ago
        > We can. The question is whether we should; Yeah that's my point. The backlash of banning things is warranted for many reasons. But why care when we've already moved on to forced injections through career intimidation.