With all due respect, you seem to be saying that this 'introductory text' is insufficiently sophisticated, and proceed to dump a high density rebuttal in stilte

With all due respect, you seem to be saying that this 'introductory text' is insufficiently sophisticated, and proceed to dump a high density rebuttal in stilted, academic style. You may be extra smart in the sense of understanding the topic in a deep way, but it sure does seem foolish and/or myopic to posture this way over a basic introduction that cites the original paper in the first sentence.