3 ms·
Well, you could create software as art. Basically to create it for the fun of creating it, not to use it. But yeah, the end result is useless then, and can be
by lucumo 5y ago
Well, you could create software as art. Basically to create it for the fun of creating it, not to use it.
But yeah, the end result is useless then, and can be thrown out.
- lazide 5y agoOr, like some art, of variable degrees of folks caring about it based on other interesting properties - and made for some purpose other than maintainability. Demoscene, obfuscated coding contests, etc. seem to fall under that category. Uselessness in the eye of the beholder or something like that.
- lucumo 5y agoBut in those cases you are creating for other people. The point was made about software that didn't have any use for any people. In those cases, only the creation itself has a use, not the end result. By definition.