Haha exactly, you joke but... If you want a society where it's even possible to take down "low-hanging" content, and where physical enforcement of that takedow

Haha exactly, you joke but... If you want a society where it's even possible to take down "low-hanging" content, and where physical enforcement of that takedown might span international boundaries, the legal goalposts sometimes need to move. And I feel like if we don't help move the technical and legal goalposts in a sympathetic manner - like recognising that a caching edge proxy is part of a site's hosting setup - we end up being part of the problem & pushing governments into more draconian solutions. (I'm not sure why the litigants in this case were targeting Cloudflare, but I assumed because they have no other idea who is hosting these infringing sites) So e.g. what does a legislature do if internet architecture has completely hardened towards privacy, such that edge proxies, whois, Facebook or whoever don't allow some visbility into the ultimate owner/publisher of a piece of content? They legislate what they can touch - the manufacture of the devices in our hands and on our laps, or the configuration of the access networks we all have to use.