My apologies, I read your post and understood the bot access part. However the timing of it sure as looked smelly to me, that's why I wrote "supposed". I proba

My apologies, I read your post and understood the bot access part. However the timing of it sure as looked smelly to me, that's why I wrote "supposed". I probably shouldn't have speculated it was all a set up, but even if it wasn't all kicked off with that intent, how it was then used sure was not ok. It reeked of trickery and deceit, which I construed as social engineering from that point of view - hope that makes sense (edit: #1). Kudos on handling this, and hope you're doing well all considered. It was fantastic to read how you claimed the ownership back. #1) that they requested "Yesterday we announced Foundation-wide Code of Conduct Enforcement. Part of making that work requires that the dnfadmin GitHub user has owner permissions to GitHub organizations."