2 ms·
I agree with this. If you do the math, you will recognize that the end amount that you have in your pocket, given the same tax rate, is the same. That is true i
by the_optimist 5y ago
I agree with this. If you do the math, you will recognize that the end amount that you have in your pocket, given the same tax rate, is the same. That is true irrespective of the rate of return.
- PaulDavisThe1st 5y agoThat's missing the point entirely. If Thiel had been unable to place that stock into a Roth IRA (i.e. buy it with funds already in the Roth), then the gains on it would end up being subject to taxation. Instead, he will be able to withdraw the $5B or whatever it is without paying any taxes on those gains. For example, had he done this with a traditional IRA, then as he eventually withdrew the money, he would pay tax on the full amount in the IRA. Put pseudo-graphically: Roth: 1: invest $1 of post-tax income in the IRA 2: direct the IRA to purchase $1 of some stock 3: wait N years 4: IRA now worth $5B 5: withdraw $5B tax-free Traditional/401k: 1: invest $1 of pre-tax income in the IRA/401k 2: direct the IRA/401k to purchase $1 of some stock 3: wait N years 4: IRA/401k now worth $5B 5: withdraw $5B and pay income tax rate on $5B - $1 Difference in total benefit: whatever the tax is on $5B - $1