4 ms·
Yes, probably they are going to use ML to classify if content has some kind of climate change denial. There could be some persantage that will be evaluatef wron
by darkhorn 5y ago
Yes, probably they are going to use ML to classify if content has some kind of climate change denial. There could be some persantage that will be evaluatef wrongly by the AI. That is okay, I mean it cannot be perfect. Some Youtubers will loose their channel just becaouse they said somwthing about climate change. At the and everyone will stop talking about climate so that they don't fall under false positeves.
- deleted 5y ago[deleted]
- perihelions 5y agoThe point is they're saying completely different: they claim they look at context, and they claim that they can handle use/mention distinctions. State of the art ML can't do that. They're soliciting buy-in from the general public, with assurances that they know are false.
- true_religion 5y agoThe distinction of context could be drawn via human moderation. I think they will set a flag that states if a channel is news. News channels get to report on questionable material without triggering ML, or at least get a human review at some point. Non-news channels would get regular ML.
- visarga 5y agoIf you sort the channels talking about climate-change by views, then you can manually vet the top few thousands and use ML for the rest. You can also do graph analysis to classify channels based on common viewers, starting with a seed of manually labelled channels and the graph.
- FormerBandmate 5y agoThat sounds like a recipe for ensuring today-small, potentially future major channels never talk about climate change