4 ms·
"The one on my 2016 C-class Mercedes was so bad that it almost caused two accidents. If not for years of pingpong..." Care to elaborate? Both how it nearly cau
by dazbradbury 5y ago
"The one on my 2016 C-class Mercedes was so bad that it almost caused two accidents. If not for years of pingpong..."
Care to elaborate? Both how it nearly caused an accident, and how you avoided one seem interesting!
- jacquesm 5y agoThere were two instances that were particularly memorable, the first was when passing through a steel bridge with fairly narrow spacing, the car - without any warning - slammed on the brakes just as I was passing the entrance to the bridge. The road surface was wet from recent rain and the car immediately started to spin due to uneven grip. I managed to avoid the posts :) This happened once more in the same spot but then I was already more alert to this kind of nonsense so that time it was pretty uneventful even if the car - again - slammed on the brakes. The other situation was when in a tight right hand turn a large advertising sign caused the car to believe I was about to have a head on collision (when in fact the object was merely passing right-to-left through my field of view). This caused me to end up on the wrong side of the road, if there had been opposing traffic it would have been a head on collision, exactly the thing it was trying to avoid. I brought the car to the local dealership, they checked it over and pronounced it sound, I sold it a week later. Murderous beta grade - or not even beta grade, proof of concept - software in that car. I was pretty loyal to the brand but I don't think I'll ever have another one, besides the plastic bling interior the fact that they shipped that junk has made the brand worthless to me. Now I drive a 24 year old car that was re-built end-to-end. It has an ECU, ABS, an aftermarket mp3 player / navigation combo and that's it.
- deleted 5y ago[deleted]