I have a hunch that at some point, there'll be an investigation and a discovery process, and we'll learn that the training dataset deliberately _excluded_ emerg

I have a hunch that at some point, there'll be an investigation and a discovery process, and we'll learn that the training dataset deliberately _excluded_ emergency vehicles because they didn't represent "normal driving" or something. That's purely uninformed speculation, but I could see it happening like this: Early on, someone says "The totality of situations encountered on the road is too complex. We're not building a system to do everything, we're building it to take over during the boring parts of a drive. Only teach it the boring stuff." Then a few years later, someone else, forgetting those initial assumptions, says "Hey this thing has done like a billion miles of boring stuff, why wouldn't you trust it for more?"