> That's not the relevant question to this discussion (and also basically a strawman). It's not strawman, it's on the same level in the science spectrum as dec

> That's not the relevant question to this discussion (and also basically a strawman). It's not strawman, it's on the same level in the science spectrum as decisively not scientific at all. It's meant to (hopefully) help them understand how stupid of a suggestion they're proposing by offering an equally stupid example. > The question is, should being a "flat earther" be banned from online monopolies as misinformation? No, the question is should we reward them for their misinformation content and the answer is no.