3 ms·
> I don't know which is better though, will the minimum wage worker pay for services that are more beneficial, or will the millionaire invest it in a company th
by rrrrrrrrrrrryan 5y ago
> I don't know which is better though, will the minimum wage worker pay for services that are more beneficial, or will the millionaire invest it in a company that creates jobs and provides services?
One way of measuring this is by looking at the "velocity of money." [1]
IIRC a dollar spent at a local, family-owned restaurant travels 7x further than one spent at a mega-chain restaurant before . The restaurant owner might use that dollar to pay their cook, who might use it later that week when he gets a haircut to pay his barber, who might later use it to buy a coffee, etc. Because value is created for both parties with each transaction, this is considered much better for the economy (and especially the local economy) compared a dollar spent at McDonald's, where it might just go into a bank account and stop moving.
I don't have the data to back it up (someone here might?), but I'd be tremendously surprised if a dollar put in the hands of a millionaire circulated more than a dollar put in the hands of the minimum wage worker, or if it created more value in the overall economy.
[1] https://www.investopedia.com/terms/v/velocity.asp https://www.investopedia.com/terms/v/velocity.asp
- WalterBright 5y ago> where it might just go into a bank account and stop moving. Banks don't make money by storing your dollar in a vault. They make money by loaning it out. They loan deposits out as fast as possible. People who get the loans don't sit on it, either. It's madness to be paying interest on money just to let it set. They borrow money in order to promptly spend it.