PP said it's about perception, true are false. That I agreed with. But GP had no qualifications. > When a solar plant breaks down or a dam bursts the worst tha

PP said it's about perception, true are false. That I agreed with. But GP had no qualifications. > When a solar plant breaks down or a dam bursts the worst that can happen is a minor inconvenience. When you get a nuclear meltdown you get land uninhabitable for literal millennia and global contamination. This is a not a fair comparison if we are talking facts not perceptions. It ignores issues of storage that doesn't make the energy outputs commensurate. It ignores the constant polution and health issue stemming from fossil fuel power plants when nothing goes wrong --- since the ability to use solar and wind wihtout those is as-of-yet undemonstrated at scale.