> The problem with no/low code is it mirrors a DSL for whatever problem being solved. Anything more general becomes a programming language. Yes! I've explored

> The problem with no/low code is it mirrors a DSL for whatever problem being solved. Anything more general becomes a programming language. Yes! I've explored visually representing functions, and state machines, but it all feels very limiting compared to written language. I think more research could be done in the visual coding area for expressing thought, because I really want coding to look like something out of neon genesis evangelion--but IDK, written language isn't bound spatially. And in written language, it's so easy to express contradictions, which is an important part of developing a system. I think MC Escher is probably the most advanced research we have in the area of visually representing recursion and contradictions lol.