5 ms·

Louder with Crowder? Really? Well he certainly is familiar with bias. I'll give you that.

• mikecoles 5y ago
  So... nothing to refute? Just don't like the guy?
  • pixelgeek 5y ago
    Post a link to content posted by someone who isn't a bully and a homophobe and I'll look at it. Crowder is a cut-rate Rush Limbaugh without the gravitas and he has the same approach. I don't have any opinion about him as a person but as a source of information he isn't reputable and I'd not waste my time listening to him.
    • Banana699 5y ago
      >Post a link to content posted by someone who isn't a bully and a homophobe and I'll look at it. That's.. Not coherent. GP didn't ask you to look, you volunteered that you don't want to look.
    • bopbeepboop 5y ago
      Your comment on why you’re not viewing it: > someone who isn't a bully and a homophobe Your explanation of your own comment: > I don't have any opinion about him as a person […] as a source of information he isn't reputable I think at some level, you recognize that you’re ignoring a source based on your opinion of him as a person, so you feel the need to claim the opposite. You’d think if your second paragraph were true, you’d have commented on his failures as a source and not him as a person as the basis of your objection in the first paragraph.
    • notarget137 5y ago
      Is it not what is said a concern for you rather who is saying it?