Just because you don't think she goes far enough doesn't mean you need to tear her down. It seems disingenuous if you're a self-described reformer like this aut

Just because you don't think she goes far enough doesn't mean you need to tear her down. It seems disingenuous if you're a self-described reformer like this author. Why is it Frances Haugen's responsibility to fix everything? Can't the author start with "yes, and"? I guess it just seems unproductive to use such a click-baity title.