4 ms·
> But my original point is that this change is hard also for men and this is not addressed in the article -- its very one sided. You're surprised an article ab
by warrenm 5y ago
> But my original point is that this change is hard also for men and this is not addressed in the article -- its very one sided.
You're surprised an article about wives is "very one sided"?
- hungryforcodes 5y agoHahaha. Well expressed. Any article about husbands could be equally criticized (and should be).
- warrenm 5y ago> Any article about husbands could be equally criticized (and should be). No - it shouldn't be criticized for being "one-sided" It's completely and 100% fine to have an article that only addresses a single issue - trying to wedge everything in everywhere is moronic
- hungryforcodes 5y agoNo, there is this idea of a balanced perspective-- even in an editorially hostile environment like Wikipedia. So even just a passing mention of other points of view are on point. Movie reviews and summaries of scientific theories on Wikipedia-- for example-- are usually written with this in mind.