> That has to include facilities too does it? whats the remaining 25% (100 million) for in that case? > It's hard not to read into your message the suggestion

> That has to include facilities too does it? whats the remaining 25% (100 million) for in that case? > It's hard not to read into your message the suggestion that you'd like Mozilla to outsource development to lower-wage countries i do not want them to do that particularly. i just pointed out that not all 800 employees will be getting the $137,000 with a $54,800 bonus wage to point out that i'm being extremely generous in my calculation of how much they're likely paying to actual employees. there are no conclusive numbers i know of, but if you just look at their open positions portal (https://careers.mozilla.org/listings/ https://careers.mozilla.org/listings/) you will surely agree that few of these will be getting that $190k...? this is quite offtopic but what i find especially disheartening about mozilla is that almost all of its revenue comes from google. every nation i know of is trying to build up their online/web presence, and yet we have only one mega corporation sponsoring web browsers to a significant degree. why isn't every nation like the USA, Canada, Australia etc each investing at least 10 million into a fund to build an open source web browser or contribute to one? why is every nation fine with that situation?