> attractive for world-class leaders You're equating greed and competence. It's an oddly common mistake. NGOs and benevolent societies are attractive on the b

> attractive for world-class leaders You're equating greed and competence. It's an oddly common mistake. NGOs and benevolent societies are attractive on the basis of their values. If monetary compensation were correlatory with quality products, we clearly wouldn't be in this position with Firefox: Mozilla's current leader is clearly world-class by your own definition (where world-class==well remunerated), and is yet demonstrably failing the company on every possible metric.