4 ms·
Yeah I'm sure it was a genuine installation. See this: https://forum.videolan.org/viewtopic.php?f=12&t=99040 https://forum.videolan.org/viewtopic.php?f=12&t=990
by krono 5y ago
Yeah I'm sure it was a genuine installation. See this: https://forum.videolan.org/viewtopic.php?f=12&t=99040 https://forum.videolan.org/viewtopic.php?f=12&t=99040
- morsch 5y agoI found this thread from 2012 while researching my post. There are in fact not a lot of posts about this topic. Are you sure these entries are sponsored? It doesn't say sponsored in the screenshot.
- krono 5y agoIt's been half a decade since I last used VLC and looked this up, but I'm certain there was a VLC staff member, perhaps a moderator, who explained the presence of these sidebar entries as measures to cover development cost. There are in fact not a lot of posts about this topic You mustn't have looked very far ;)
- morsch 5y agoWell, a couple of minutes on Google. I just looked at all results for "sponsored" on the forum and it is in fact the only thread that uses it in that sense. I'm still waiting for any concrete evidence, as I am genuinely curious what kind of sponsorships of that kind there are, or were, if any.
- krono 5y agoYou're fully aware I was making an assumption or a false recollection. There's absolutely no need for this adversarial tone.
- Townsendin 5y agoThe point is: you were wrong. In your previous posts you claimed you weren't wrong. Now in the first post where you acknowledge that you were wrong, you're going to complain that you feel attacked? ;)